On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 12:25 PM 'Red Daly' via golang-nuts <golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > Have the authors considered the implications of requiring the `type` keyword > to use a generic type, not just at declaration time? Would this open up more > syntax possibilities, such as `var x T<type int>`? This might be easier to > read at the expense of five more characters of typing. It also could unify > declaration and usage syntax even more than the proposal.
Well, no, I don't think we ever considered that approach. Ian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAOyqgcXXohj7ne1evSY%2B%2Bx-MnQL504vrrS%3DfCGN5B686-p0kug%40mail.gmail.com.
