On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 3:38 PM Kevin Chadwick <m8il1i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't and I don't mean to make demands of other peoples time. Though I'm > sure > security has been carefully considered and might be fresh in peoples minds. I don't think it has, because I don't think it needs to be. There is no reason to think that there are any security implications. > I am sure some members of the rust community will do so likely > inaccurately, if/when Generics are released. > Okay. It seems like a complete waste of their time, but as far as I'm concerned, that's no ones problem but their own. Despite seeing horrible to read code, again on Reddit today. The blog asked > for > us to consider voting. I'm inclined to upvote if the security of Go code is > expected to increase, otherwise I would likely down vote for readability > concerns. > Feel free to make a judgement in any case. My personal projection is that security will mostly be unaffected (I don't know of many security issues in the past that were related to Go type safety or lack thereof), if it *is* affected, the effect will be positive and that type-safety will increase. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/bd5281c2-f231-f84c-cf42-f84372b30bb7%40gmail.com > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAEkBMfFjr49F-MPx0xnksfz%3DSRzAtbZFtmR9p0XW_N5rJyjJFA%40mail.gmail.com.
