On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 06:12:43PM -0700, Michael Ellis wrote: > Three cheers for mage <https://magefile.org/>. It's more verbose than make > but it's pure Go. I use it to build and test projects that include > generated html/css/js supported by a Web Assembly clients communicating > with a server.
It may be nicer, however the beauty of make is that it is ubiquitous, everybody already has it. With mage, your installation instructions now need to contain how / where to get mage in the first place, leaving the user with a random binary somewhere which they probably never ever need nor update again. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/20210824055435.eg46zvnazct7m7dh%40feather.
