The issue is not a vulnerability in the language itself but the use of that 
language to embed malware so AV signatures do not detect it. The feeling is 
that our InfoSec will be wanting to restrict obscure languages (Go, Rust 
etc...).
On Tuesday, 23 August 2022 at 15:22:39 UTC+1 jesper.lou...@gmail.com wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 2:58 PM 'Gopher-Insane' via golang-nuts <
> golan...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>> They are suggesting that Go is being more widely used than others, making 
>> it more of a risk. 
>>
>>
> Is their position "we shouldn't write Go in our organization, because it's 
> being used by malware creators elsewhere?"
>
> I'm still confused as to what the context of this is. 
>
> -- 
> J.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/631fa521-9209-42a5-9244-bbb1a774ef69n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to