Can you elaborate on that reference? At first review, it means you are putting in lots of effort making lots of progress (anti red queen) but that would mean the progress made did not invalidate any of effective Go (which seems not possible given the addition of generics). I’m doubting you implied little effort was put in over 10 years so little progress has been made :)
> On Dec 5, 2022, at 2:19 PM, 'Dan Kortschak' via golang-nuts > <golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 2022-12-05 at 09:27 -0800, Tsvetomir Lazarov wrote: >> How relevant is Effective Go actually, given the January 2022 update >> that this document has not been updated significantly since 2009? > > Still relevant. This is one of the virtues of having a language that is > not built on the Red Queen model of progress[1]. > > [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Queen%27s_race > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/0af2089eb4f34cd5f8e67f1c9b1cad62c1b76e57.camel%40kortschak.io. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/C9BDCD17-4499-453C-A74A-A165EFEBD8A2%40ix.netcom.com.
