On Tue Jun 27, 2023 at 00:09 CET, Eltjon Metko wrote: > > I find this a strange stance, given that most of the people actually > participating in the protest are unpaid volunteers. So I don't see how > that > can be considered a "commercial dispute", to be honest. > > The commercial dispute is between Reddit and API Consumers. it has > nothing to do with mods or the users. No-mater how certain you may be > who is in the right and who is in the wrong, the most certain thing here > is that there is great part of the commuinty who are being held hostage > and used as tool for commercial disupute that has nothing to do with > them or this subredit. To be clear I am not accusing the mods of Golang > subredit for being in a powertrip (because initally it did not come from > them) but other users who try to force their narrow worldview onto > others. If this was an ethics issue, depnding on how clear it is there > might be ground for protests, commercial disputes should never be ground > for holding even a fraction of the users hostage.
could we please not use this "holding hostage" expression to describe a situation that has *nothing* to do (in intensity, dire consequences and life threatening aspects) with a *real* hostage situation ? I am sure in english there are many more fitting idioms to use for a situation where people use their right to express their opinions in whatever pacific modus operandi they chose to use. [Personally, I see this as an opportunity to switch to a more FOSS-friendly alternative: kbin, lemmy, you name it, as long as it rhymes with fediverse.] thanks, -s -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CTN95DEA8LYK.2B2W26LRH8V2K%40clrinfopc42.