Neat. And interesting. eBPF was cool to learn about. So, thank you Cheikh. Two nits: you don't compare to using pprof, which would have been the first thing to pull out. Second, eBPF is available on windows; so the article's claim there is misleading at best.
On Thursday, June 25, 2026 at 10:56:14 AM UTC-3 Cheikh Seck wrote: > Hi gophers, > > Wrote a hands-on piece on using eBPF with Go to gain kernel-level > observability for AI-generated services. > > Covers kprobes, tracepoints, and perf-event ringbuffers - all from pure Go > code. The problem: I shipped a service that looked fine in staging (P95 > latency 40ms) but was slow in production with no visibility into > kernel-level issues. eBPF let me trace syscalls, network events, and file > I/O directly from the kernel. > > Read it here: > https://cheikhhseck.medium.com/ebpf-in-go-observability-for-ai-generated-services-9aae7573b823 > > > Curious if anyone else is running eBPF-based observability in production > with Go - would love to compare notes on map sharing and BTF compatibility. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/ac9c9a94-83b8-4d1d-a0da-de7849fcdfe6n%40googlegroups.com.
