Thank you Jason. Will update the article. I want to blame Lite Agent but it's my fault for failing to verify such a claim. On Friday, June 26, 2026 at 3:27:19 AM UTC Jason E. Aten wrote:
> Neat. And interesting. eBPF was cool to learn about. So, thank you Cheikh. > > Two nits: you don't compare to using pprof, which would have been the > first thing to pull out. > Second, eBPF is available on windows; so the article's claim there is > misleading at best. > > On Thursday, June 25, 2026 at 10:56:14 AM UTC-3 Cheikh Seck wrote: > >> Hi gophers, >> >> Wrote a hands-on piece on using eBPF with Go to gain kernel-level >> observability for AI-generated services. >> >> Covers kprobes, tracepoints, and perf-event ringbuffers - all from pure >> Go code. The problem: I shipped a service that looked fine in staging (P95 >> latency 40ms) but was slow in production with no visibility into >> kernel-level issues. eBPF let me trace syscalls, network events, and file >> I/O directly from the kernel. >> >> Read it here: >> https://cheikhhseck.medium.com/ebpf-in-go-observability-for-ai-generated-services-9aae7573b823 >> >> >> Curious if anyone else is running eBPF-based observability in production >> with Go - would love to compare notes on map sharing and BTF compatibility. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/ff8c45d1-7d18-465d-a42c-dbca447351b3n%40googlegroups.com.
