Sean O'Rourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was so sure I didn't even have to *ask* them, so nyah! But seriously, > when you point out a hole in the tests, they're updated. When you point > out an ambiguity in the spec, shouldn't it be updated as well? Quick show > of hands -- how many contestants thought this was ambiguous? how many > asked for clarification?
I didn't notice the ambiguity. It seemed clear to me that periods would occur only at the ends of sentences and would always be followed by whitespace (though for my purposes that didn't matter). If you interpreted the rules differently, I don't understand how you could have believed it was okay to use -056. The only thing I found confusing (not ambiguous) about the rules is that they defined paragraphs even though paragraphs had no effect and no test cases had more than one paragraph. -- Keith C. Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Washington, DC
