I can only answer from a perspective of data persistence. DataNucleus
provides (at least) as many features as Hibernate for persistence to
RDBMS, and SQL, and is fully compliant with *all* specifications in
that domain. Why you think that you gain something by having Hibernate
is unknown to me. The datastore concerned here is simply not an RDBMS
so cannot offer some of the things found in RDBMS. There are ample
blog postings relating to the differences. Similarly Hibernate has no
support for persisting to other types of datastores, so if the
datastore is BigTable then how do you expect such support to appear in
Hibernate.

In the same way what does SQL do for you that such as JDOQL/JPQL/GQL
don't? Some concepts just don't exist in the BigTable datastore.

If instead your question was with respect to BigTable against RDBMS
then ok, I'd leave that to Google to answer, though obviously there
are ample posts in this forum by Google people answering it.

--Andy (DataNucleus)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to