On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:50 PM, George Moschovitis <[email protected]> wrote: > - Objectify seems to have more momentum, but is not standard, dunno if > this will be supported in a year or two
Just to give you a little perspective, it's worth pointing out how thin projects like Objectify really are: http://www.ohloh.net/p/objectify-appengine/analyses/latest At less than 10k lines of code, compare this to Datanucleus (> 500k): http://www.ohloh.net/p/datanucleus/analyses/latest As the lead developer, I'm genuinely flattered that people hold Objectify in such high regard, but I really have to give the credit to the folks at Google working on the backend and the Low-Level API. Objectify is a very simple project and we're trying to keep it that way. If I were to be hit by a bus tomorrow, there are plenty of other people who can step up... or anyone using the code could branch/fork it. It's just not that complicated. Jeff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
