Not to mention the threats consist of actions that were suggested as an alternative. That suggestion was reproached as unacceptable. So it is quite confusing.
On Apr 7, 2:16 pm, Andy Freeman <[email protected]> wrote: > > Some user reported a problem and wanted to know if Google had any plan > > to solve it. That equates to wanting a "guarantee" in your world? Some > > kind of twisted world you live in there. > > When considering a plan to solve a problem, I think that it's > reasonable to consider whether said plan will actually solve the > problem. Why? Because if a plan doesn't solve the problem, the > problem still exists. > > I am willing to assume that Google is doing what it can reasonably do > about this. The continued complaints suggest that the results of > those efforts are inadequate. And, we've seen "threats" regarding > what will happen if Google doesn't come through. Maybe those people > will be satisfied by something short of a guarantee, but .... > > And, as has been noted, a Google representative posted a solution and > was ignored. > > On Apr 6, 11:33 pm, Andy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Yes, I do. > > > I'm glad you finally learn the word "obligation". Too bad you didn't > > learn it earlier when you spewed your nonsense that obligation can > > only come from "laws and contracts". > > > Feel free to consult a dictionary first next time when you find > > yourself once again tempted to use a big word you don't understand. > > > > I'm not angry. > > > Good for you. Definitely worth reporting back to your anger management > > counselor > > > > I'm merely pointing out that Google's > > > capabilities in this area are limited, that they need to take their > > > complaints elsewhere if they want guarantees. > > > Who's talking about "guarantees"? > > > Some user reported a problem and wanted to know if Google had any plan > > to solve it. That equates to wanting a "guarantee" in your world? Some > > kind of twisted world you live in there. > > > In fact the only person who even brought up the word "guarantee" is > > you. > > > Do you always argue against your own strawman like that? > > > > Do you really believe that Google can honor a promise that a given > > > site won't be blocked if the Chinese govt wants to block said site? > > > (Feel free to assume that the site is hosted in China.) > > > Who's talking about "promise that a given site won't be blocked" other > > than you? > > > Once again you're the only person to use words like "guarantees" and > > "promise" > > > You must be really busy arguing with your own strawman like that... > > > > I merely pointed out that Google can't do as they ask > > > And you're the spokesperson of Google? self-appointed? > > > This is what the OP asked: "Does Google have a plan for dealing with > > this?" > > No different than any other threads that are also about reporting > > problems and asking for solutions. > > > For whatever reason such a simple question bothers you tremendously. > > To such a degree that you felt compelled to spew nonsense such as > > "Google can't do as they ask", when in fact you have > > no standing to speak for Google on what they can or cannot do. > > > So the real question is why does the simple question "Does Google have > > a plan for dealing with this?" bother you so much? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
