And your customers will *love* you when Google deletes all of their
data along with your apps for violating the terms of use...

On Apr 13, 9:37 am, gabriel munteanu <[email protected]> wrote:
> i think you should do these 10 apps for yourself and every friend you
> have with a google account [you + 3 friends = 40 apps].
> i won't bet that they will increase this number any time soon.
>
> jgabios
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Jeremiah Elliott
>
>
>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hello All -
> > I am doing some research for a project that I have coming up and have
> > a few questions that I have not been able to find by searching the
> > group. This will be my first AppEngine application, so sorry if this
> > is a dumb question. The project is going to be a SASS model
> > application where our customers will have a web application that we
> > write made available to them. While I realize that I could have a
> > customer id in every object stored in the data store and write
> > business logic to verify that each customer sees only their data, I
> > would rather have each customer have their own complete appengine
> > application with their own tables that are totally separate. If I put
> > all customers in one application, i will not be able to upgrade the
> > application per-customer, but rather all at once.  Currently I only
> > have available 10 applications when I sign in.  The other advantage of
> > having all customers in their own application instance is that we will
> > know exactly what the resources for a given customer is every month.
>
> > I am hoping that Google increases the number of available applications
> > as i use them. So when I utilize my 9th applicaiton, it shows that I
> > actually have 20 or something like that. I have not found any thing on
> > the web that would give me any indication one way or the other if this
> > is the case, so I am assuming that it isn't.
>
> > If having more than 10 applications is simply not an option, are there
> > any good workarounds from a data store point of view? Anything like
> > schemas in most relational databases?
>
> > Has anyone asked google to increase this limit? If so how did that
> > work out?
>
> --
> jgabioshttp://bash.editia.info
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to