The TOS will only be violated if the purpose of using multiple accounts is to get around paying. We full expect to pay for every application we have. Why would google delete an account that is paying them money every month? If, however, I had an application that cross-talked between applications and did so in a manner that completely eliminated the need to pay, then I could see google not liking that. This application will have no data being shared between applications. Therefor, will not be in violation of the TOS.
---Jeremiah On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Wooble <[email protected]> wrote: > > And your customers will *love* you when Google deletes all of their > data along with your apps for violating the terms of use... > > On Apr 13, 9:37 am, gabriel munteanu <[email protected]> wrote: > > i think you should do these 10 apps for yourself and every friend you > > have with a google account [you + 3 friends = 40 apps]. > > i won't bet that they will increase this number any time soon. > > > > jgabios > > > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Jeremiah Elliott > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hello All - > > > I am doing some research for a project that I have coming up and have > > > a few questions that I have not been able to find by searching the > > > group. This will be my first AppEngine application, so sorry if this > > > is a dumb question. The project is going to be a SASS model > > > application where our customers will have a web application that we > > > write made available to them. While I realize that I could have a > > > customer id in every object stored in the data store and write > > > business logic to verify that each customer sees only their data, I > > > would rather have each customer have their own complete appengine > > > application with their own tables that are totally separate. If I put > > > all customers in one application, i will not be able to upgrade the > > > application per-customer, but rather all at once. Currently I only > > > have available 10 applications when I sign in. The other advantage of > > > having all customers in their own application instance is that we will > > > know exactly what the resources for a given customer is every month. > > > > > I am hoping that Google increases the number of available applications > > > as i use them. So when I utilize my 9th applicaiton, it shows that I > > > actually have 20 or something like that. I have not found any thing on > > > the web that would give me any indication one way or the other if this > > > is the case, so I am assuming that it isn't. > > > > > If having more than 10 applications is simply not an option, are there > > > any good workarounds from a data store point of view? Anything like > > > schemas in most relational databases? > > > > > Has anyone asked google to increase this limit? If so how did that > > > work out? > > > > -- > > jgabioshttp://bash.editia.info > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
