Yes, it is experiencing very clear image degradation.  Ill try it in
production and post back to this thread.  Even if it is clean in
production, it will be worth noting in the SDK notes about the image
service.

Thanks!

On May 11, 3:41 am, "Nick Johnson (Google)" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> I would strongly suggest trying this in production before looking for
> any other solution. The SDK uses the Python Imaging Library, which is
> not the same as the Images service in production, so I would not
> expect the same result.
>
> It's also possible that your image is simply more compressible when
> rotated. Are you experiencing actual visual degradation?
>
> -Nick Johnson
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Pindropper Info <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I am going to post this in the python group too, but I think it may be
> > a general engine topic.
>
> > I recently added some image rotation code (using images.rotate)  I put
> > in a JPEG and get out a JPEG.
>
> > The image I put in is about 28k, the image I get back is 12k.  Is
> > there any way to eliminate this degradation?
>
> > I have ONLY RUN THIS LOCALLY at this point, not on the actual app
> > engine runtime in production.
>
> > Thanks
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to