So is this a bug that should be reported?
On Oct 22, 10:09 am, "Nick Johnson (Google)" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Hi,
> If you set an expiration time for your static content, it may be cached at
> geographically diverse endpoints. Without one, it won't be, as it doesn't
> know how long it's safe to cache for.
>
> http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/config/appconfig.html#St...
>
> *-Nick Johnson
> *
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:44 PM, stumpy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I am developing an application that targets the UK market and am
> > looking at ways of improving the download speed of static files hosted
> > on app engine such as .js, .css, .png etc.
>
> > My testing suggests that app engine is serving all static content from
> > america which adds significant latency. Downloading a static file of
> > size <1KB takes 200-250ms from england.
>
> > Are there any plans in the future to geographically distribute static
> > content across data centers? Or would I be better off using amazon
> > cloud front for serving everything static?
>
> --
> Nick Johnson, Developer Programs Engineer, App Engine
> Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration Number:
> 368047
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
