I am indeed using the Java development environment as my primary development language and have already set the expirey header to the maximum allowed.
Out of interest I tested the edge caching performance using python by configuring the static files in the app.yaml. The performance is the same. The disappointing lack of response suggests that this situation is here to stay so ill be switching to EC2 cloudfront for the static content. On Oct 27, 12:31 pm, Barry Hunter <[email protected]> wrote: > See:http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/config/appconfig.html > > (notice the 'java' in the url :) > > stumpy is saying already setting a expiration time, just that it has > no affect on edge caching. > > 2009/10/27 nickmilon <[email protected]>: > > > > > Don't understand what you mean by "appengine-web.xml"file. > > But what Mr. Nick Johnson is suggesting I believe is to set an > > expiration time for yourstaticcontent as described here: > > >http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/config/appconfig.html > > i.e use a default expiration or expiration declaration in your Yaml > >file. > > > I don't see all this as a potential bug. > > > On Oct 26, 12:39 pm, stumpy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So is this a bug that should be reported? > > >> On Oct 22, 10:09 am, "Nick Johnson (Google)" <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > > >> > Hi, > >> > If you set an expiration time for yourstaticcontent, it may be cached at > >> > geographically diverse endpoints. Without one, it won't be, as it doesn't > >> > know how long it's safe to cache for. > > >> >http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/config/appconfig.html#St... > > >> > *-Nick Johnson > >> > * > > >> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:44 PM, stumpy <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > > >> > > I am developing an application that targets the UK market and am > >> > > looking at ways of improving the download speed ofstaticfiles hosted > >> > > on app engine such as .js, .css, .png etc. > > >> > > My testing suggests that app engine isservingallstaticcontent from > >> > > america which adds significant latency. Downloading astaticfileof > >> > > size <1KB takes 200-250ms from england. > > >> > > Are there any plans in the future to geographically distributestatic > >> > > content across data centers? Or would I be better off using amazon > >> > > cloud front forservingeverythingstatic? > > >> > -- > >> > Nick Johnson, Developer Programs Engineer, App Engine > >> > Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration > >> > Number: > >> > 368047 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
