Yes. - For cost savings : read this : http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/billing.html I think GAE is cheap but it only depends on your app.
- Learning python, I think it's very easy... I learnt it 1 year ago only for GAE. - data in G's cloud... I can't answer but you should read this upload/ download data : http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/tools/uploadingdata.html On Jan 6, 5:36 pm, paulmo <[email protected]> wrote: > ok thank you for that. seems to come down to cost savings, with price > of learning python and accepting that one's data is in G's cloud and > is not necessarily under one's exclusive control. > > Am I on the right track? > On Jan 6, 10:59 am, Sylvain <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Do you miss not having a relational database? Workarounds given my > > > situation of using 2 tables? > > > Not really. I think it's easier. > > But if you need relations, you should read this article > > :http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/modeling.html > > > If you have only 2 table, maybe you can merge them. > > So denormalize your datas is often a good thing. > > > > Are/can you use Google's webtoolkit or ajax/css apis without having to > > > deploy 3rd party apps? > > > Yes. but for ajax/css, I think it's always easier to use a library > > like Jquery, Google Closure,... > > > Just upload them as static file/dir or use direct links > > :http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs/documentation/#AjaxLibraries > > > I think it's similar to PHP, no real diff here.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
