I'm asking if it's wise to store it as a query parameter embedded in a
web page.


On Feb 9, 12:26 am, "Ikai L (Google)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> A cursor serializes to a Base64 encoded String, so you can store it anywhere
> you want to store strings: Memcached, Datastore, etc. You can even pass it
> as an URL parameter to task queues.
>
> 2010/2/8 Stephen <[email protected]>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Ah right, Nick's blog does say start_key and not offset. My bad.
>
> > Maybe there will be warnings in the upcoming documentation, but my
> > first instinct was to embed the serialised cursor in the HTML as the
> > 'next' link. But that doesn't look like a good idea as Nick's decoded
> > query shows what's embedded:
>
> > PrimaryScan {
> >  start_key: "shell\000TestModel\000foo\000\232bar\000\200"
> >  start_inclusive: true
> > }
> > keys_only: false
>
> > First, you may or may not want to leak this info. Second, could this
> > be altered on the client to change the query in any way that's
> > undesirable?
>
> > Once you have a cursor, where do you store it so you can use it again?
>
> > On Feb 8, 10:17 pm, "Ikai L (Google)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I got beaten to this answer. No, there is no traversal to get to the
> > offset.
>
> > > BigTable has an underlying mechanism for range queries on keys. Indexes
> > are
> > > essentially a key comprised of a concatenation of application ID, entity
> > > type, column, value. When a filter operation is performed, the datastore
> > > looks for a range matching this criteria, returning the set of keys. A
> > > cursor also adds the datastore key of the entity so it is possible to
> > > serialize where to begin the query. This is actually a bit awkward to
> > > explain without visuals. You can watch Ryan Barrett's talk here:
>
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tx5gdoNpcZM
>
> > > Hopefully, we'll be able to post an article at some point in the future
> > > explaining how cursors work.
>
> > > 2010/2/8 Alkis Evlogimenos ('Αλκης Ευλογημένος) <[email protected]>
>
> > > > There is no offset. The protocol buffer stores a start_key and a
> > boolean
> > > > denoting if this start key is inclusive or not. The performance of
> > > > continuing the fetch from a cursor should be the same as the
> > performance of
> > > > the first entities you got from a query.
>
> > > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Stephen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > >> On Feb 8, 7:06 pm, "Ikai L (Google)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> > The official docs are pending, but here's Nick Johnson to the
> > rescue:
>
> >http://blog.notdot.net/2010/02/New-features-in-1-3-1-prerelease-Cursors
>
> > > >> What are the performance characteristics of cursors?
>
> > > >> The serialised cursor shows that it stores an offset. Does that mean
> > > >> that if the offset is one million, one million rows will have to be
> > > >> skipped before the next 10 are returned? This will be faster than
> > > >> doing it in your app, but not as quick as the existing bookmark
> > > >> techniques which use the primary key index.
>
> > > >> Or is the server-side stateful, like a typical SQL implementation of
> > > >> cursors? In which case, are there any limits to the number of active
> > > >> cursors? Or what if a cursor is resumed some time in the future; will
> > > >> it work at all, or work slower?
>
> > > >> --
> > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups
> > > >> "Google App Engine" group.
> > > >> To post to this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > >> [email protected]<google-appengine%[email protected]>
> > <google-appengine%[email protected]<google-appengine%[email protected]>
>
> > > >> .
> > > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>
> > > > --
>
> > > > Alkis
>
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups
> > > > "Google App Engine" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > .
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > [email protected]<google-appengine%[email protected]>
> > <google-appengine%[email protected]<google-appengine%[email protected]>
>
> > > > .
> > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>
> > > --
> > > Ikai Lan
> > > Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Enginehttp://
> > googleappengine.blogspot.com|http://twitter.com/app_engine
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Google App Engine" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<google-appengine%[email protected]>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>
> --
> Ikai Lan
> Developer Programs Engineer, Google App 
> Enginehttp://googleappengine.blogspot.com|http://twitter.com/app_engine

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

Reply via email to