Yeah, I've seen posts from 2008 that were using PropertiedClass in a way that is still valid today. Thanks Nick.
On Mar 8, 11:25 pm, "Nick Johnson (Google)" <nick.john...@google.com> wrote: > Hi Nickolas, > > PropertiedClass is an implementation detail, and as such could change in > future. I wouldn't consider such a change very likely, however. > > -Nick Johnson > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Nickolas Daskalou <n...@daskalou.com>wrote: > > > > > This is a question for Google employees. > > > Is it safe to use db.PropertiedClass as discussed towards the end of > > this thread: > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/... > > > ? > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google App Engine" group. > > To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > -- > Nick Johnson, Developer Programs Engineer, App Engine > Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration Number: > 368047 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
