Nick, thanks for the reply. Do you have any other recommendation on how to accomplish what we are trying to do without using any GAE unpublished interfaces?
Thanks, PK On Mar 9, 2:40 am, Nickolas Daskalou <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, I've seen posts from 2008 that were using PropertiedClass in a > way that is still valid today. Thanks Nick. > > On Mar 8, 11:25 pm, "Nick Johnson (Google)" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Hi Nickolas, > > > PropertiedClass is an implementation detail, and as such could change in > > future. I wouldn't consider such a change very likely, however. > > > -Nick Johnson > > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Nickolas Daskalou <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > This is a question for Google employees. > > > > Is it safe to use db.PropertiedClass as discussed towards the end of > > > this thread: > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/... > > > > ? > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "Google App Engine" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]<google-appengine%[email protected]> > > > . > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > > -- > > Nick Johnson, Developer Programs Engineer, App Engine > > Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration Number: > > 368047- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
