I reread the release notes and it seems I misunderstood.  I thought
you'd just be getting a minimum of 3 instances all the time and
anything above that would be just like it is now, but it appears that
it is (what you get now + 3).

Interesting.

On Nov 19, 4:49 pm, Robert Kluin <[email protected]> wrote:
> It sounds like the warmup requests might be very useful for you too.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 05:10, Kenneth <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Interesting to see that reserving instances is coming in 1.4.0.  While
> > we all wait for the pricing details, I have a question:
>
> > If we reserve instances will we see a lower number of 10 second
> > instance errors under load, ie is this only beneficial to very low
> > volume apps?  Right now I'm running with more than 10 instances and
> > I've seen 3 instance loading errors already this morning.  All of my
> > instances except one are below one second latency.
>
> > Thanks
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "Google App Engine" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

Reply via email to