@Kenneth I had a similar doubt but this clears things (now + 3). That sounds cool!
-Nischal On Nov 20, 2:08 am, Kenneth <[email protected]> wrote: > I reread the release notes and it seems I misunderstood. I thought > you'd just be getting a minimum of 3 instances all the time and > anything above that would be just like it is now, but it appears that > it is (what you get now + 3). > > Interesting. > > On Nov 19, 4:49 pm, Robert Kluin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > It sounds like the warmup requests might be very useful for you too. > > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 05:10, Kenneth <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Interesting to see that reserving instances is coming in 1.4.0. While > > > we all wait for the pricing details, I have a question: > > > > If we reserve instances will we see a lower number of 10 second > > > instance errors under load, ie is this only beneficial to very low > > > volume apps? Right now I'm running with more than 10 instances and > > > I've seen 3 instance loading errors already this morning. All of my > > > instances except one are below one second latency. > > > > Thanks > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "Google App Engine" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]. > > > For more options, visit this group > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
