On Friday, February 11, 2011 2:00:09 AM UTC-5, gops wrote: > > 3) For, HTTPS, Google is already charging extra for secure requests. > Why separate billing ? >
For this one, I suspect it would involve giving applications static IP addresses, since TLS/SNI still isn't supported on most browsers on Windows XP, and the installed base of XP machines doesn't seem to be going away any time soon. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
