this looks to me like the features associated with GAEfB are now being offered as add-on services to traditional GAE users. If all other billing in GAE stays the same and we can now add these premium services piecemeal for a monthly price, that sounds like a big win to me. The per-user pricing that GAEfB originally had was problematic for sites that needed to serve both internal and external customers
my two cents... b On Feb 11, 9:19 am, Geoffrey Spear <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday, February 11, 2011 2:00:09 AM UTC-5, gops wrote: > > > 3) For, HTTPS, Google is already charging extra for secure requests. > > Why separate billing ? > > For this one, I suspect it would involve giving applications static IP > addresses, since TLS/SNI still isn't supported on most browsers on Windows > XP, and the installed base of XP machines doesn't seem to be going away any > time soon. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
