The short version is, yes, we would like to write a Java version. A more complicated answer is that it's not clear to me what kind of implementation it should be. The Python version of ProtoRPC was written such that it was possible to write services without a compilation step as the normal protocol buffer library requires:
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/ It's not clear to me if Java developers would want similar implementation to Python which does not require additional build steps or would they be ok just using the standard protocol buffer compiler. Ultimately having some kind of annotation driven way to define services and messages might be a good idea. I'd like to hear feedback from Java developers about it once they've had a look at the Python implementation. > Hi Rafe, > > That's great! Any planning for Java? > > Regards, > KhanhDM. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
