On May 25, 1:33 pm, Emanuele Ziglioli <[email protected]> wrote: > On May 26, 8:13 am, Mars <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I understand that AlwaysOn is still under discussion, but I'd just > > like to point out that the old pricing model suggested that having an > > idle instance costs around 0.4c/hr (0.3 / 3 / 24) while in the new > > model, it costs 5c/hr (reserved instance). The old price might not be > > sustainable, but a 12x jump in price is a bit dramatic IMHO. > > Isn't one 24h instance included in the $9/month? > Perhaps with multithreading one would be enough for most apps. > What I don't understand: would that be 'always on'? it's fundamental > to have one running to avoid the dreadful cold start delay.
I think it's 3 instances for Always On when it was first released in 1.4.0: http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/0f90ef8dda3b8400 Not sure if it's still the case. > > > The other thing I'd like to suggest is to restore the free email quota > > to 2000 for paying apps. This way Google can both block off free rider > > spammer and not look like a cheap as. > > you sound like a kiwi :-) lol I am one indeed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
