It keeps quit from Google/Greg's side. Hope they announce more information shortly.
Everybody is just speculating which is not good. On May 29, 11:51 pm, JH <[email protected]> wrote: > While things are still being decided I'd also like to inquire about > "roll over" instance hours. If we switch to this new instance hour > system, say I reserve 24 and only use 20. Can the 4 "roll over" to my > next billing period? > > Also, from my previous post, maybe if I decline my SLA I could get 24 > extra instance hours a day? (gotta give me credit for trying) > > 15 minutes idle time billed seems a bit odd, we can't be billed for > what instance time we actually use? > > Finally, still curious how "always on" will work.. > > Thanks and great work on GAE > > On May 29, 12:20 pm, JH <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Being that an SLA typically just means I will receive a refund for > > down time, in other words a fraction of $9/month and $.08/hour, I'd > > like to propose an alternative model for people to have paid apps > > without an SLA. I am definitely interested in uptime, however a > > refund of my $.08/hour for 30 minutes downtime doesn't get me too > > excited. > > > On May 12, 2:14 am, Kenneth <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Greg mentioned he was putting together an FAQ so let's help him out! > > > > If you're going to answer this just put in your question into a single > > > line, > > > let's not try and answer them here or give opinions, there's plenty of > > > other > > > threads for that. I do understand that Google doesn't have answers to some > > > these. > > > > Here's my list: > > > > 1) What is the time granularity of the instance pricing? ie if I have an > > > instance up for 5 minutes, what am I charged, $0.08 / 60*5? > > > 2) Will I be able to tune the scheduler myself, ie set it to performance > > > or > > > low cost, Will I be able to limit the min or max number of instances > > > created (with the obvious impact on user experience)? > > > 3) Python concurrency, will this require any code changes, do you have any > > > estimates based on your testing of the number of well behaved requests per > > > second a single instance will be able to handle for a given framework? > > > 4) Database charges, when can you give us more details over what Max gave > > > in > > > the other thread, are you charging for deletes, what do you expect the > > > ratio > > > to be between the new pricing metric and the Datastore API calls metric we > > > have today? > > > 5) Will you be charging differently for instances that use different > > > amounts > > > of memory, since this seems to be the cost that you're going after that > > > isn't charged for in the current model. > > > > Thanks, > > > Kenneth > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
