In docs it says that HRD is more costly "*The High Replication Datastore
costs more due to the additional replication (see billing page for pricing
details). Due to the higher cost, we recommend High Replication Datastore
primarily for those developers building critical App Engine applications
that require the highest availability*".
It also says "*queries on a single guestbook to be strongly consistent, but
also limits changes to the guestbook to 1 write per second (the supported
limit for entity groups). Therefore, writing to a single entity group per
guestbook is not ideal when high usage is expected. If your app is likely
to encounter heavy write usage, consider using another means. For example,
you can put recent posts in memcache with an expiration, and then display a
mix of recent posts from memcache and posts retrieved from the datastore.*"
How could we trust by putting data to memcache if we know it can be evicted
any time? To use HRD is not viable for applications which need strong
consistency for high rate of puts. At the moment MS is perfect what it does
but bloody thing keeps dying.. I can't believe there is no way to improve
MS and you are switching to HRD. In long term HRD can cause more problems
for applications parts were it wasn't aticipating to receive higher rate of
inserts, and having a limit of 1 write per second is a disastrous.

On 6 December 2011 23:29, Gregory D'alesandre <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Kenneth,
>
> We are planning to add blobstore migration at some point but it won't
> likely be until the middle of Q1 at the earliest.
>
> Greg
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Kenneth <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> Can you give us some indication if the migration tool is ever going to
>> include blobstore migration? That's the only thing holding me back. I know
>> I can do it myself but I'd rather not. I see now that it has gone ga, have
>> you stuck a fork in it and called it done?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Google App Engine" group.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/f7KzNP-pCuwJ.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>>
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

Reply via email to