Yes, I don't as well understand why VIP option is so expensive. Is it because they use proxy to pass traffic through SSL to app engine instances? I can't believe dedicated IP for app use would cost so much? On Dec 9, 2011 6:36 PM, "Richard Watson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Great to hear! > > I'm now mostly wary of the cost of VIP. I'm sure the team would like it to > be cheaper, but if it can't be done, it can't be done. I guess one option > is to use SNI until an app has enough paying customers for VIP, or just > take the hit and do it right. > > From the launch message: > "We will be offering two types of SSL service, Server Name Indication > (SNI) and Virtual IP(VIP). SNI will be significantly less expensive > than VIP when this service is fully launched" > > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/d7fb200cbe9d2010 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/eb8-mdPK5bMJ. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
