Hello All, Someone has any work around for this, or aren't you using python27+threadsafe ?
Thank you very much. Hello Googlers, Any progress or prevision on this ? It is very frustrating having python 2.7 without thread safe. I'm also trying to contact premier account's email but without success. I'd like to get "real support". About 6323, is it really "medium priority" ? I think this is a high priority issue. Any way. Thanks On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 7:11 PM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Brian, Gregory > > Thanks for your valuable insights! > I did know about the issue 6323 and had stared it. However I was not > sure it was the same as the issue mentioned CPU bound requests. > My app is very much RPC bound. I've added a comment to this thread to > the issue and I've set threadsafe: no and will monitor. So far latency > seems Ok and the number of instances is 5x-6x of when I had > threadsafe: yes. > I do agree with Felippe, we should be able to maintain the 50% > discount until python27 and threadsafe are fully supported. > This is also making things worse - it seems the minimum latency is not > being enforced correctly, I also have this. > > http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=5765&can=5&sort=-status&colspec=ID%20Type%20Component%20Status%20Stars%20Summary%20Language%20Priority%20Owner%20Log > > Sérgio > > > On Dec 7, 5:12 am, "Gregory D'alesandre" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Felippe, > > > > As you noted Python 2.7 is released. While Python 2.7 is still > > experimental it is working well for some but indeed there are still > issues > > before it will be fully GA. There was a concern that we were abandoning > > Python because there was no solution for concurrent requests. Python > 2.7, > > even in its current state, shows that we are not abandoning Python. We > > tried our best to make appropriate trade-offs with the new pricing model > > but at some point we needed to roll it out for the reasons we've > discussed > > at length in the past. For instance, when this was written we were also > > going to launch the new pricing 1.5 months earlier than we actually > > released it, which likely saved you quite a bit of money, as opposed to > > this which is costing you more. > > > > While my guess is you'd still rather that the 50% discount persisted I > hope > > that answers your question, > > > > Greg > > > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Felippe Bueno <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Brian Quinlan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > >> There is a known bug where the combination of Python 2.7 and enabling > > >> concurrent requests causes large latency increases. The Python 2.7 > > >> runtime is still experimental and bugs like this are expected. > > > > > Ok, I understand that. > > > > > Greg, could you please let us know why we have the new full-sized > instance > > > hour for python and still not have python concurrent requests ? > > > > > I'm asking because you wrote< > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/...> > > > : > > > > > Q: Will there be a solution for Python concurrency? Will this require > any > > > code changes? > > > Python concurrency will be handled by our release of Python 2.7 on App > > > Engine. We’ve heard a lot of feedback from our Python users who are > > > worried > > > that the incentive is to move to Java because of its support for > > > concurrent > > > requests, so we’ve made a change to the new pricing to account for > > > that. *While > > > Python 2.7 support is currently in progress it is not yet done *so we > > > will be ** > > > providing a half-sized instance for Python (at half the price) until > > > Python > > > 2.7 is released.* * > > > > > Ok, I know. It was already released (as experimental), but I thought > that > > > the purpose to holding "full-sized instances" was to give to python > users > > > the concurrent requests. > > > > > Thanks > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > > "Google App Engine" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]. > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
