you mean, always have one instance more than required ? ( who is going to pay for that ? ) , and is not minimum idle instance same thing ?
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Tapir <[email protected]> wrote: > I means "why not to conquer it instead of trying to avoid it?". > > If you can't conquer it, please lower the instance prices to the > normal level, I mean about tenth to fifth of the current level so that > apps can open more resident instances to avoid "Cold Starts". > > Here is one solution: give each app one hidden resident instance, when > an app needs a new instance to handle a coming request, GAE use the > hidden resident instance to handle the coming request, and open the > new instance at the same time. Your current "open a new instance and > let the new coming request to be handled after the new instance is > warmed up" is not a good implementation. > > On Mar 14, 11:51 am, Tapir <[email protected]> wrote: > > . > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
