On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 2:47 PM, alex <[email protected]> wrote: > > And to remind you while you're bashing,
I am not bashing GAE. I offer constructive criticism of the ill-conceived parts of GAE, of which there are several. Short of dragging Googlers off to Las Vegas for an all-you-can-eat hookers and blow buffet, this is the best way I (as a customer) know how to enact change. If enough customers complain loudly enough for long enough, Google will adjust their development priorities. The only reason AWS has been brought up is because there is an argument to be made that they suffer from the same perverse incentive WRT performance. To some extent this is true, but it's certainly less direct than with GAE. If it were more direct, more people would probably complain. And even if AWS works "the same way", there's still no reason to embrace it, especially when GAE is multiple times more expensive. There is no reason to turn this into a general discussion of AWS vs GAE. The fact that my bill can vary by a factor of 6 because of fluctuations entirely within Google infrastructure is a problem. Period. Jeff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
