Thanks, Jeff. Is it possible to repeat the test with qps < 10 to rule out the limit that Johan pointed out? In other words, how big is the performance difference if you had less requests that do more work?
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Jeff Schnitzer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Drake <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jeff your Low volume is effecting your numbers. The more you do the more > > consistent the numbers become. I don't know what black magic Google > does, > > but the more people I have the more my instances get faster, the faster > my > > datastore reads (and writes) become, and the better the hit ratio on my > > memcache. > > I do not believe you without quantitative measurements. I see no > reason to believe that something that sucks at low volume will > suddenly stop sucking at high volume, and I have a lot of reason to > distrust your wild assertions. > > Also: The system requiring 10 backends is a real-world app with 2k+ > simultaneous users. How much more volume do you think it needs? > > Jeff > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
