Truly. Personally I'm inclined to use direct PDF generation, which is what I currently need. Fewer moving parts and dependencies.
On Saturday, August 25, 2012 9:24:27 AM UTC+2, timh wrote: > > The main problem with this approach for dymamic generation will be the > requirement to stick stuff into docs, and pull back out with conversions, > and then probably delete documents once generated. So if it's being used > as part of an anonymous service docs will be given a serious workout ;-) > >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/Zr6769LllkkJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
