For me, PDF generation was never really the problem, generating PDF is fairly straightforward. It was the other facilities in the conversion api I was interested in ;-)
T On Saturday, August 25, 2012 4:08:28 PM UTC+8, Richard Watson wrote: > > Truly. Personally I'm inclined to use direct PDF generation, which is what > I currently need. Fewer moving parts and dependencies. > > On Saturday, August 25, 2012 9:24:27 AM UTC+2, timh wrote: >> >> The main problem with this approach for dymamic generation will be the >> requirement to stick stuff into docs, and pull back out with conversions, >> and then probably delete documents once generated. So if it's being used >> as part of an anonymous service docs will be given a serious workout ;-) >> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/ZphNXnzl18IJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
