hi imran, i'm not comparing gaecms to static files. i used gaewiki too with with same site, no quota problems, i found out that a wiki was not suitable for such site.
i thought gaecms was great, and i just want to make you aware of an invisible problem that i encountered, i reorted because i cared of it, else i wouldn't have bothered to sit and write a coule of lengthy messages. have a good day. On Saturday, December 8, 2012 5:39:08 AM UTC+8, GAE-CMS wrote: > > Hi ID, > > Thank you for your feedback and your positive comments about gae-cms. Any > CMS would fail compared to static HTML files being served in terms of > frontend instance hours or any other quota for that matter. The issue is > whether the ease-of use and features that the CMS brings makes it worth it > as a website creator rather than to write HTML from scratch. If you have > 10 pages it might be worth it to do in static HTML but if you have 100 it > is rather cumbersome to maintain that many static files. This is where a > CMS comes in which will necessarily use up more of your quota as it has to > make memcache lookups, make calls to the database and perform CPU intensive > tasks that do not exist when a server is simply returning static files. > > Having said that it is my goal to make gae-cms as cheap as possible and I > don't think my own website gae-cms.com has gone down yet on account of > using up the free account quota that it currently has even with 100s of > hits. It would probably be more useful to compare multiple CMS' to > determine which is the cheapest rather than comparing it to static pages. > But I think your criticism is still somewhat valid and I will try to > profile it and clear up any bottlenecks that might be unreasonably using up > the free quota. > > Thank you, > Imran > > On Thursday, December 6, 2012 10:41:43 PM UTC-5, ID wrote: >> >> Hi Imran, this is my site http://gokturkanitlari.appspot.com/ >> >> I used GAE-CMS for few days only, during those days, every day my site >> was shut down for half day for being "over quota" in appsot.com it >> shows "over quota" for "frontend instance hours" my site maybe got 200-300 >> page views daily then, that should not cause over quota. >> >> i had to remove gae-cms after using just few days. i now use static files >> instead, have no problems since, even the page views increased to 400-500 >> daily. >> >> i'm not sure what was the problem, i had not modified gae-cms, i just >> downloaded it and installed as it is.. i hope you can fix it. it's great >> product, elegant, clean, easy, functional.. >> >> please let me know if you fix it, i very much like to use it. >> >> thanks >> >> On Sunday, November 18, 2012 2:31:23 PM UTC+8, GAE-CMS wrote: >>> >>> Dear ID, sorry for the troubles. Can you confirm which Frontend >>> Instance Class you are using? I have not faced this problem with similar >>> usage so I'm not sure why. I do make use of lots of caching but maybe you >>> can take a look with a fresh set of eyes? I was just about to announce the >>> release of the latest beta version which uses ndb instead of db so this >>> might help you out as it has 2 additional layers of caching before the >>> database call. Please have a look. Also if you can point me to your site >>> I can try setting up a similar one and see where the problem might be? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Imran >>> >>> On Friday, October 12, 2012 6:11:56 AM UTC-4, ID wrote: >>>> >>>> Imran, GAE-CMS consumes the appengine's free quota for "frontend >>>> instance hours" very quickly!! perhaps need some caching/optimizing? >>>> >>>> it turned out to be a big problem for me! google shut my site 2nd time >>>> for being over quota. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, June 13, 2012 12:06:59 AM UTC+8, GAE-CMS wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I am the creator of a brand new CMS called >>>>> GAE-CMS<http://www.gae-cms.com>. >>>>> It is based on Google App Engine written in Python 2.7. It is free and >>>>> open source (GPL). It has been designed from the ground up for speed and >>>>> usability. As well it is very easy for designers to modify every aspect >>>>> of >>>>> the theme and apply different themes to different sections of the >>>>> website. >>>>> It is developed in a very modular way with different types of content >>>>> able >>>>> to inherit from the base content class and define how it behaves and its >>>>> views. I believe it is a fresh new take on CMSs and believe it could >>>>> surpass some of the current great CMSs if enough developers get behind >>>>> it. >>>>> This is an open call to developers to check out our project, install it, >>>>> use it and if you believe in it then contribute back and join our >>>>> leadership team to help guide the vision of this project. Visit >>>>> http://www.gae-cms.com for more information and access to the code. >>>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/YSA0KNv5dLQJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
