We use it for Voost (https://www.voo.st/). Other than one time when GAE basically blocked all of cloudflare (you can search this list for the story), we're happy with it. In theory, CF is now whitelisted by Google so that can't happen again.
SSL is cheaper than Google's offering and the extra statistics are useful. I can't tell a difference performance-wise, but I haven't tried any quantitative measurements. I like their DNS management system, so much so that I have migrated DNS for all my domains to CF even though most do not use the reverse proxy. You can do this, in which case packet routing is "as normal", and then only enable the proxy with a buttonclick if you are getting attacked. So there doesn't seem to be any downside to setting up the system; whether you choose to turn the proxy on or not is a separate decision. Disclosure: CF's head of engineering is a cycling buddy of my biz partner, but otherwise we're a paying customer like everyone else. Jeff On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > Looking at using CloudFlare, is the free plan worth the extra hops for your > dynamic content? > > FYI: https://www.cloudflare.com/plans > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/OWmpNd1BWE0J. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
