Thanks *a lot* for the suggestion, It certainly is interesting, I will dive deeper into the article as soon as possible
On Sunday, December 30, 2012 3:28:10 PM UTC+2, HaimS wrote: > > Kaan you should try Incapsula ]http://www.incapsula.com/] > > Works like Cloudflare but offers much better security & no false positive > identification. > > Also, only 9$ for SSL support instead of 20$.. > > > I switched after reading this review [ > http://www.ehackingnews.com/2012/11/incapsula-vs-cloudflare-security-review.html] > > and been very happy ever since. > > > > > בתאריך יום שבת, 29 בדצמבר 2012 20:38:43 UTC, מאת Kaan Soral: >> >> Why I want to use CloudFlare: >> It can block non-search-engine scrappers, maybe malicious people trying >> to download content for malicious use. (I assume CF can do this) >> >> Why I'm afraid to use CloudFlare: >> I sometimes get identified as a false malicious user myself, there were >> 1-2 times in the past when I couldn't enter a site with CF on, maybe at >> that time someone from my country was attacking that site, who knows, but >> still this is unacceptable. >> >> Other features such as SSL etc are solvable otherwise, but blocking >> malicious behavior is an extreme challenge itself, so If I were to use CF, >> I would use it only for this feature. >> >> Any comments on these points? >> >> >> On Saturday, December 29, 2012 3:11:30 AM UTC+2, Johnson wrote: >>> >>> Looking at using CloudFlare, is the free plan worth the extra hops for >>> your dynamic content? >>> >>> FYI: https://www.cloudflare.com/plans >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/4N1et6D9nFIJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
