On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Dimitri Adamou < [email protected]> wrote:
> As these small cache files are roughly around 3-4kb each, I'm just > wondering if Google can operate normally with me keeping this process in or > skipping the cache part completely (Read the Bucket vs scanning the content > locally - I'm certain local scan is faster) > > I have various other cache's implemented but I believe those are safe to > stay as they are generally larger processed files > > My program has a* very high File I/O* as we are a Form service - Is > Google App Engine for us? > It would really depend on how many of these cache files you have, the performance you are expecting, and the price you're willing to pay. Depending on the number of files, you could conceivably store the entire set in instance memory, which would make your application very fast. Even if that wasn't possible, you could also store the cache files as memcache objects - it would still be fast, but you'd need to pay for dedicated memcache service (you can try using shared memcache, but from your description you'll want the better cache hit ratio of dedicated). In short: start sharing some performance numbers and your current setup! ----------------- -Vinny P Technology & Media Consultant Chicago, IL App Engine Code Samples: http://www.learntogoogleit.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
