Hi Kaan, Out of curiosity, have you tried resampling the PNG (while leaving them as PNG) with something like https://imageoptim.com/? I've seen huge amounts of size come out of images, without any noticeable degredation to the image quality.
j On Saturday, 2 May 2015 15:41:18 UTC-7, Kaan Soral wrote: > > Thanks a lot for all your input > > I've cranked up the default_expiration to 60d, yet I doubt it will have > any effect, unless there is a cut-off structure and 1h is below that > cut-off, the majority of these images are consumed by an API which is > pretty much a black-box > > My monthly usage is around 6TB's, so cloud storage isn't worth the effort, > app engine is 0.12/gb, while cloud storage becomes 0.11/gb as far as I see > > If all else fails, I will probably move the serving to AWS, as the 33% > saves stack up to $2k+ in a year, or just degrade the images and reduce the > user satisfaction, but the AWS option is obviously better > > ----- > > On the other hand, Cloudflare might reduce this cost to 0, but I'm not > sure about the reliability, they don't advertise limits for their free CDN, > there were also some App Engine incompatibilities in the past, their system > might also block the API whose access is crucial > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/167b15f1-6cfc-436e-96e7-6f02945761ae%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
