[email protected] wrote:
> http://codereview.appspot.com/110096/diff/4003/4012#newcode64
> Line 64: public boolean isSafeIdentifier(String ident) {
> On 2009/09/15 18:31:58, DavidSarah wrote:
>> Is this duplicating checks elsewhere in the cajoler?
> 
> There are checks that identifiers are valid.
> But this is necessary because otherwise, AlphaRenaming might take in
> code that passes those checks and produce code that fails them.

Right, but I meant that there is a maintenance and security review issue
with having these checks in multiple places.

-- 
David-Sarah Hopwood  ⚥  http://davidsarah.livejournal.com

Reply via email to