On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:41 AM, felix <[email protected]> wrote: > no I really really want the precajoled canary files in production > deployments. it's immensely helpful to have small fast harmless diagnostic > canaries in production systems and there's no benefit to omitting them. > I looked at the light.xml again. Since the input URLs are of the form:
http://caja.appspot.com/imaginary-2/canary2.js and since we control the caja.appspot.com namespace, we can ensure there is no collision. Ok, no benefit to omitting. I agree we can keep 'em then. :) Ihab -- Ihab A.B. Awad, Palo Alto, CA
