On 2013/06/06 22:19:01, kpreid2 wrote:
On 2013/06/06 22:14:54, MarkM wrote:
> Each of these description records should have links to issues in
some
> issue tracker. Have the first of these be to a google-caja tracking
issue.
> These issues would be a good place to put the text explaining the
hazard
> of proceeding with the issue unrepaired, and, for those that the
default
> Caja configuration permits, why it does so. These would then be easy
to
> navigate to from explicit.html.
This is a nice possible enhancement, but I don't think it is a
prerequisite for
this change — it specifically does not expose the ability to ignore
problems as
via caja.js configuration. I would prefer that this change simply be
seen as
refactoring for Caja.
Fine with me. Still LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/9979047/
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Caja Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
