On 2013/08/22 18:33:53, kpreid2 wrote:
LGTM
It would be nice to know if this is a performance regression in
Chrome/our use
thereof, or if version 30 has more things for the scanner to scan.
on the test machine,
comparing r5568 vs r5569 on Chrome 29,
"ant runtests" time before the scans is about the same (4m30s),
es53 scan goes from 60s to 100s,
es5 scan goes from 9s to 13s
comparing Chrome 29 vs Chrome 30 on r5569
"ant runtests" time before the scans is about the same (4m30s),
es53 scan goes from 100s to 120s,
es5 scan goes from 13s to 26s (timeout)
from that, seems likely that it's just that there are more things to
scan,
though there's a chance that something about the scanner in particular
is less efficient in Chrome 30
https://codereview.appspot.com/13171044/
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Caja Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
