On 2013/08/22 19:15:35, kpreid2 wrote:
On 2013/08/22 19:01:08, felix8a wrote:
> On 2013/08/22 18:33:53, kpreid2 wrote:
> > LGTM
> >
> > It would be nice to know if this is a performance regression in
Chrome/our
use
> > thereof, or if version 30 has more things for the scanner to scan.
...
> from that, seems likely that it's just that there are more things to
scan,
Sorry, I should have been more specific (and I didn't actually
remember we have
this info in a nice form); the scanner will print a performance
summary at the
end of its console log, like so (this example is Firefox and an
uncommitted
version):
19861 references scanned. Total elapsed time 191776ms, speed
103.56/s.
Could you take a look at whether the number of references is larger?
that info isn't saved right now (we're only saving fail results). I'd
have to rerun it all manually.
I'm thinking of marking some tests as "always save results" whether they
fail or not (for this and other reasons), but haven't done it yet.
https://codereview.appspot.com/13171044/
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Caja Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
