On Feb 4, 9:31 pm, Ben Collins-Sussman <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the details, but it's also not news to us. :-)
Thanks again for your detailed answer, I did suspect your architecture was something like that :-) We'll try to live with it for now, it's good to hear that potential latency improvements are in the work. I also wonder if some of the latency issues comes down to the http +webdav protocol being synchronous - for instance I guess it does one MKCOL and waits for it to be finished before the second deeper MKCOL is performed. Would supporting the svn:// protocol make any difference in latency, or is it synchronous in the same way? -- Stian Soiland-Reyes --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hosting at Google Code" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code-hosting?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
