TripleM is right, but your confusion is understandable. Last year both
formats were used, I don't remember exactly how and why it changed, but I'm
almost sure Round 1 used only the small inputs for time penalty and the
strategy you mention was applied. But it was then settled to be as TripleM
mentioned, and I guess this won't change anymore. So now rushing trough the
smalls is necessarily the best strategy, well if you think you can solve the
large one with a little more thinking.
Carlos Guía


On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:52 AM, TripleM <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Quoting from the rules:
>
> Penalty Time = Submission time of the last input you correctly solve
> (time is measured from start of contest) + four minutes for each
> incorrect small submission (only for small inputs you eventually
> solve)
>
> In particular, the first part isn't the time you solved the last small
> input; it's the time you last solved anything. If you're expecting to
> solve a large input, it makes no difference whether you've rushed
> through all the small inputs or not.
>
> You have to upload the problem code at the same time you submit your
> solution. Comments are completely meaningless in contests like this,
> all you're doing is disadvantaging yourself :P
>
> On Aug 26, 3:20 pm, Ken Corbin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
>
> > It appears that the base penalty time is the time elapsed from the
> official
> > start of the contest until you submit the answers to all of the small
> dataset
> > problems.  Add 4 minutes for each resubmitted small dataset answer.  You
> have
> > until the end of the allotted contest time to submit answers to the large
> > dataset problems, those do not appear to count against your base penalty
> > time.
> >
> > Consequently, the top programmers appear to be writing something quick
> and
> > dirty to solve the small dataset problems, then go back and solve all of
> the
> > large dataset problems.
> >
> > I'm also wondering how long we have to upload the problem code used to
> solve
> > the problem.  Largely because I am rather appalled at the quality of the
> code
> > I find myself writing under extreme time pressure.  Would be nice to go
> back
> > and add some decent comments before actually uploading it.
> >
> > Thanks a bunch,
> > -Ken
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-codejam" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to