@vexorian I agree with you, everybody who achieved 99 score is more meaningful. I have removed the top 100 and top 50... Instead I added the list with all participants who achieved 99 score grouped by country... http://siddiq-technology.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-code-jam-qualification-round.html
And a complete list just for fun... and find your name... http://siddiq.info/jam2009/all-participants-google-code-jam-2009-qualification-round.html On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 3:14 AM, vexorian <[email protected]> wrote: > > Those rankings are biased as the start time of the round was > friendlier for US and also my country. Many European and Asian > contestants started later. > > I think it would be more meaningful to see the percentages of each > country considering everybody who achieved 99, not just top 100. > > Nevertheless, this bias problem won't apply for the next rounds, and > it would be nice these stats were published for the next rounds. > > On Sep 4, 3:53 pm, Siddiq Akbar <[email protected]> wrote: > > Here are some nice statistics... > http://siddiq-technology.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-code-jam-qualifi... > > > > USA rocked on the charts for top positions... > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-codejam" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
