Here are the stats for Round1: http://siddiq-technology.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-code-jam-2009-round1-some.html
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:10 PM, qasim zeeshan <[email protected]>wrote: > Yeah. :) > > I hope when you will get your company you can introduce this new technology > "AJAJ". I am sure after Ramadan u will look for it. :P > > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Siddiq Akbar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes JSON it is! >> >> It has pretty much replaced XML from AJAX... making it AJAJ ... :p >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 6:01 AM, qasim zeeshan <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Oh, seems like some JSON. Is it? >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Siddiq Akbar <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> @Vivek >>>> >>>> I recommend you play around with Firebug. Its is a nice place to start >>>> investigating websites. >>>> >>>> Check this: >>>> http://code.google.com/codejam/contest/scoreboard/do?cmd=GetScoreboard&contest_id=90101&show_type=all&start_pos=1&views_time=0&views_file=0&csrfmiddlewaretoken= >>>> >>>> Have fun >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Siddiq >>>> >>>> http://siddiq.info >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:35 AM, vgbhat <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Siddiq, >>>>> >>>>> Nice job! BTW, how did you extract the data from code jam dashboard? >>>>> Did you use any script again? >>>>> >>>>> I am learning on some web stuff. So, want to know :-) >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Vivek >>>>> >>>>> On Sep 6, 1:09 pm, Siddiq Akbar <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > @vexorian >>>>> > I agree with you, everybody who achieved 99 score is more meaningful. >>>>> > I have removed the top 100 and top 50... >>>>> > Instead I added the list with all participants who achieved 99 score >>>>> grouped >>>>> > by country... >>>>> http://siddiq-technology.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-code-jam-qualifi. >>>>> .. >>>>> > >>>>> > And a complete list just for fun... and find your name... >>>>> http://siddiq.info/jam2009/all-participants-google-code-jam-2009-qual. >>>>> .. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 3:14 AM, vexorian <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > > Those rankings are biased as the start time of the round was >>>>> > > friendlier for US and also my country. Many European and Asian >>>>> > > contestants started later. >>>>> > >>>>> > > I think it would be more meaningful to see the percentages of each >>>>> > > country considering everybody who achieved 99, not just top 100. >>>>> > >>>>> > > Nevertheless, this bias problem won't apply for the next rounds, >>>>> and >>>>> > > it would be nice these stats were published for the next rounds. >>>>> > >>>>> > > On Sep 4, 3:53 pm, Siddiq Akbar <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > > > Here are some nice statistics... >>>>> > > >>>>> http://siddiq-technology.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-code-jam-qualifi. >>>>> .. >>>>> > >>>>> > > > USA rocked on the charts for top positions... >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Qasim Zeeshan >>> PUCIT, PU Alumni '04 >>> Software Engineer >>> CambridgeDocs Pakistan >>> A Division of Document Science | EMC USA >>> http://qzeeshan.blogspot.com/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > -- > Qasim Zeeshan > PUCIT, PU Alumni '04 > Software Engineer > CambridgeDocs Pakistan > A Division of Document Science | EMC USA > http://qzeeshan.blogspot.com/ > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-codejam" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
